Environmental Research Letters

333.7k citations
8.9k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Climate variability and models
    • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
    • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
    • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
    • Climate change and permafrost
    • Cryospheric studies and observations
    • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Papers in

    • Climate variability and models 1.8k
    • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics 867
    • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 651
    • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations 664
    • Cryospheric studies and observations 660
    • Climate change and permafrost 655
    • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols 593

Environmental Research Letters

8.3k papers receiving 324.5k citations

Peers

Environmental Research Letters
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Global and Planetary Change 146.1k
  • Atmospheric Science 87.1k
  • Environmental Engineering 50.4k
  • Water Science and Technology 33.2k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 30.8k
Replace Nature Climate Change with:
Nature Climate Change United States
Climatic Change United States
Nature Geoscience United States
Ecological Indicators China
Water China
Environmental Modelling & Software United States
International Journal of Remote Sensing China
Ecological Modelling United States
Ecological Applications United States
Global Biogeochemical Cycles United States
Environmental Research Letters relative to Nature Climate Change United States Nature Climate Change's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Nature Climate Change · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Research Letters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Research Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Research Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Research Letters more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Environmental Research Letters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Research Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Research Letters.

About Environmental Research Letters

The 8.9k papers published in Environmental Research Letters in the last decades have received a total of 333.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Environmental Research Letters usually cover Global and Planetary Change (4.5k papers), Atmospheric Science (2.8k papers), Environmental Engineering (1.1k papers), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (931 papers) and Water Science and Technology (828 papers) specifically the topics of Climate variability and models (1.8k papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (867 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (664 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (660 papers), Climate change and permafrost (655 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (651 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (593 papers) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (522 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Research Letters are David B. Lobell, Arpad Horvath, Yoshihide Wada, Jonathan Koomey, Jonathan A. Foley, S. J. Goetz, R. Kwok, Petra Döll, Holly Gibbs and Navin Ramankutty.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact