Erwin Glaasker

11 papers receiving 817 citations

Peers

Erwin Glaasker
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Biotechnology 235
  • Food Science 422
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 160
  • Physiology 33
  • Endocrinology 31
Replace Lloyd D. Witter with:
Lloyd D. Witter United States
A. D. Hitchins United States
Carmen Sánchez-Rivas Argentina
Juan M. Mesas Spain
Grahame W. Gould United Kingdom
Brett J. Savary United States
Hilmer A. Frank United States
M. K. Rayman Canada
Ingolf Krause Germany
C.J. Bunthof Netherlands
Erwin Glaasker relative to Lloyd D. Witter United States Lloyd D. Witter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Lloyd D. Witter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erwin Glaasker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erwin Glaasker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erwin Glaasker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erwin Glaasker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erwin Glaasker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erwin Glaasker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erwin Glaasker. The network helps show where Erwin Glaasker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Erwin Glaasker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erwin Glaasker Line = papers co-authored together Erwin Glaasker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1998219
2 1998142
3 199699
4 199882
5 199672
6 199772
7 199668
8 199855
9 199446
10 199628
11
Osmotic regulation of transport processes in Lactobacillus plantarum
19981

About Erwin Glaasker

Erwin Glaasker is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics, Genetics and Biotechnology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 884 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Probiotics and Fermented Foods (7 papers), Gut microbiota and health (3 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (2 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (2 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (2 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (2 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (235 citations), Food Science (422 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (160 citations), Physiology (33 citations) and Endocrinology (31 citations). Erwin Glaasker has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Hungary and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bert Poolman, Wil N. Konings, Patrick C. Wouters, J.P.P.M. Smelt, B. Poolman, Tjakko Abee, A. Verheul, P. F. Ter Steeg, Esther H. M. L. Heuberger and Juan E. Suárez. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Molecular Microbiology, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Membrane Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact