Erlei Wang

1.3k citations
42 papers · 967 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Erlei Wang

39 papers receiving 947 citations

Peers

Erlei Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Biochemistry 178
  • Food Science 197
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 112
  • Insect Science 73
  • Molecular Medicine 28
Replace Hamizah Shahirah Hamezah with:
Hamizah Shahirah Hamezah Malaysia
Bisheng Zheng China
María D. Navarro‐Hortal Spain
Zijian Wu China
Yanbo Zhang China
Magdalena Walasek-Janusz Poland
Lei Yao China
Jong Dai Kim South Korea
A‐Rang Im South Korea
Erlei Wang relative to Hamizah Shahirah Hamezah Malaysia Hamizah Shahirah Hamezah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Hamizah Shahirah Hamezah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erlei Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erlei Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erlei Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erlei Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erlei Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erlei Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erlei Wang. The network helps show where Erlei Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Erlei Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erlei Wang Line = papers co-authored together Erlei Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010105
2 201783
3 201176
4 201472
5 201469
6 202359
7 201953
8 202451
9 201246
10 202246
11 202144
12 202037
13 202122
14 202318
15 202317
16 202017
17 201616
18 202215
19 202114
20 202011

About Erlei Wang

Erlei Wang is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Neurology, Food Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 42 papers that have together received 967 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (4 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (4 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (178 citations), Food Science (197 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (112 citations), Insect Science (73 citations) and Molecular Medicine (28 citations). Erlei Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jingbo Liu, Yanjun Liu, Zuozhao Wang, Ting Zhang, Yongguang Yin, Fengguang Pan, Mingwu Lou, Yan Zhang, Wenzhu Zhao and Feng Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Food Chemistry, RSC Advances and Neuroreport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact