Eric Porter
Impact in
- Music top 2%
- Music History and Culture
- Musicology and Musical Analysis
- Theater, Performance, and Music History
- Diverse Music Education Insights
- Diverse Musicological Studies
-
- Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Papers in
- Music 7
- Music History and Culture 7
- Theater, Performance, and Music History 4
- Musicology and Musical Analysis 3
-
- Race, History, and American Society 3
- Sport and Mega-Event Impacts 2
- Social and Cultural Dynamics 1
- Co-authors
- Daniel Fischlin (1 shared paper)Phillip S. Kott (1 shared paper)Graham Lock (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Quarterly (2 papers)Journal of American History (1 paper)Rethinking History (1 paper)The Seventeenth Century (1 paper)American Music (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Eric Porter
12 papers receiving 57 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Music 69
- Urban Studies 12
- Sociology and Political Science 52
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 4
- General Psychology 1
Countries citing papers authored by Eric Porter
This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Porter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Porter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Porter. The network helps show where Eric Porter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Eric Porter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What Is This Thing Called Jazz?: African American Musicians as Artists, Critics, and Activists | 2002 | 67 |
| 2 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 3 | Jazz and Revival | 2009 | 6 |
| 4 | 1999 | 5 | |
| 5 | "Black No More"?: Walter White, Hydroquinone, and the "Negro Problem" | 2006 | 4 |
| 6 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 10 | Assessing the Effect of Calibration on Nonresponse Bias in the 2006 ARMS Phase III Sample Using Census 2002 Data | 2008 | 2 |
| 11 | Out of the blue: Black creative musicians and the challenge of jazz, 1940-1995. | 1997 | 1 |
| 12 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 0 |
About Eric Porter
Eric Porter is a scholar working on Music, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Marketing and Ocean Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 106 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music History and Culture (7 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (3 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (1 paper) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (69 citations), Urban Studies (12 citations), Sociology and Political Science (52 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (4 citations) and General Psychology (1 citation). Eric Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Fischlin, Phillip S. Kott and Graham Lock. Their work appears in journals such as American Quarterly, Journal of American History, Rethinking History, The Seventeenth Century and American Music.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.