Rethinking History

696 papers and 3.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 696 papers published in Rethinking History in the last decades have received a total of 3.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Rethinking History usually cover Sociology and Political Science (343 papers), History (298 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (87 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy, History, and Historiography (195 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (126 papers) and Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Rethinking History are Beverley Southgate, Alun Munslow, Andreas Reckwitz, Vanessa Agnew, Benno Gammerl, Hayden White, Bárbara Adam, Florian Bieber, Fiona Kumari Campbell and K.A. Jenkins.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Rethinking History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Rethinking History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Rethinking History.

Countries where authors publish in Rethinking History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Rethinking History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Rethinking History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rethinking History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025