Graham Lock

510 citations
16 papers · 284 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Graham Lock

15 papers receiving 203 citations

Peers

Graham Lock
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Language and Linguistics 182
  • Linguistics and Language 66
  • Literature and Literary Theory 132
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 88
  • Communication 16
Replace Eva Núñez-Méndez with:
Eva Núñez-Méndez United States
Abm Tsui Hong Kong
Erdoğan Bada Türkiye
Xiaoye You United States
Punjaporn Pojanapunya Thailand
Hasan Ansary Iran
Akbar Afghari Iran
Indika Liyanage Australia
Nóra Németh Hungary
Monika Chavez United States
Graham Lock relative to Eva Núñez-Méndez United States Eva Núñez-Méndez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Eva Núñez-Méndez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Lock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Lock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Lock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Lock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Lock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Lock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Lock. The network helps show where Graham Lock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Graham Lock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Graham Lock Line = papers co-authored together Graham Lock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200686
2 199781
3
Functional English Grammar
199529
4 200318
5 200316
6
Functional Grammar in the ESL Classroom: Noticing, Exploring and Practicing
201012
7 198910
8
Variation, norms and prescribed standard in the Mandarin Chinese spoken in Singapore
19889
9 20066
10 20105
11 20004
12
Genres in an Academic Writing Class.
19984
13 20012
14 20181
15 20001
16 20180

About Graham Lock

Graham Lock is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language, Literature and Literary Theory and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multilingual Education and Policy (5 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (5 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (2 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (2 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (2 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (2 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (182 citations), Linguistics and Language (66 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (132 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (88 citations) and Communication (16 citations). Graham Lock has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rodney H. Jones, David C. S. Li, Charles Lockhart and Eric Porter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, Australian Journal of Linguistics, Modern Language Journal, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development and Journal of Second Language Writing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact