Graham Lock

618 citations
18 papers · 388 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Graham Lock

16 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers

Graham Lock
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Language and Linguistics 248
  • Linguistics and Language 90
  • Literature and Literary Theory 172
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 131
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 40
Replace Goodith White with:
Goodith White Malaysia
Eva Núñez-Méndez United States
Nóra Németh Hungary
Thom Kiddle United Kingdom
An H. Kuppens Belgium
Janie Rees‐Miller United States
Sandra Silberstein United States
Mary Swan United Kingdom
Fiona Farr Ireland
Xiaoye You United States
Graham Lock relative to Goodith White Malaysia Goodith White's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Goodith White · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Lock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Lock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Lock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Lock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Lock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Lock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Lock. The network helps show where Graham Lock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Graham Lock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Graham Lock Line = papers co-authored together Graham Lock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2006101
2 199784
3 201668
4
Functional English Grammar
199531
5 200320
6 200318
7 198913
8
Functional Grammar in the ESL Classroom: Noticing, Exploring and Practicing
201013
9
Genres in an Academic Writing Class.
19989
10 20108
11 20067
12 20006
13 20013
14
Nederland, Narcissus' paradijs
20053
15 20002
16 20181
17 20111
18 20110

About Graham Lock

Graham Lock is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language, Literature and Literary Theory, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Anthropology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (5 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (4 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (2 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (2 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (2 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (1 paper) and Linguistic Variation and Morphology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (248 citations), Linguistics and Language (90 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (172 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (131 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (40 citations). Graham Lock has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rodney H. Jones, David C. S. Li, Charles H. Lockhart and Eric Porter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, Journal of American History, Asian Ethnicity, Visual Communication and Journal of Second Language Writing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact