Emre Cinar
Impact in
- Public Administration top 5%
- Public Policy and Administration Research
-
- Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Papers in
-
- Public-Private Partnership Projects 4
- Public Procurement and Policy 3
- Innovation and Knowledge Management 3
-
- Public Policy and Administration Research 5
- Co-authors
- Chris Simms (7 shared papers)Paul Trott (5 shared papers)Mehmet Akif Demircioğlu (7 shared papers)Ali A. Guenduez (2 shared papers)Tommy Høyvarde Clausen (1 shared paper)Sercan Ozcan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Research Policy (3 papers)Public Management Review (3 papers)The Journal of Technology Transfer (2 papers)Small Business Economics (1 paper)Public Administration Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaNorway
In The Last Decade
Emre Cinar
11 papers receiving 376 citations
Emre Cinar's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Public Administration 104
- Management of Technology and Innovation 112
- Strategy and Management 126
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 51
- Political Science and International Relations 105
Countries citing papers authored by Emre Cinar
This map shows the geographic impact of Emre Cinar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emre Cinar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emre Cinar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emre Cinar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emre Cinar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emre Cinar. The network helps show where Emre Cinar may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Emre Cinar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 237 |
| 2 | 2019 | 52 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2025 | 0 |
About Emre Cinar
Emre Cinar is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 13 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers), Public-Private Partnership Projects (4 papers), Public Procurement and Policy (3 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers), E-Government and Public Services (3 papers), Business and Economic Development (2 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (2 papers) and Migration, Refugees, and Integration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (104 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (112 citations), Strategy and Management (126 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (51 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (105 citations). Emre Cinar has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Chris Simms, Paul Trott, Mehmet Akif Demircioğlu, Ali A. Guenduez, Tommy Høyvarde Clausen and Sercan Ozcan. Their work appears in journals such as Research Policy, Public Management Review, The Journal of Technology Transfer, Small Business Economics and Public Administration Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.