Emma Field

704 citations
36 papers · 488 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Field

32 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers

Emma Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Hepatology 167
  • Infectious Diseases 302
  • Animal Science and Zoology 96
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 166
  • Health 54
Replace Harriet MacLehose with:
Harriet MacLehose United Kingdom
Vesta Richardson Mexico
Marcelino Esparza‐Aguilar Mexico
Christopher Troeger United States
Lilly Cheng Immergluck United States
Sukrti Nagpal United Kingdom
Daniel Hungerford United Kingdom
Frédéric Debellut United States
Roberto del Aguila United States
Reina M. Turcios-Ruiz United States
Emma Field relative to Harriet MacLehose United Kingdom Harriet MacLehose's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Harriet MacLehose · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Field. The network helps show where Emma Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Field Line = papers co-authored together Emma Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010186
2 2010103
3 201937
4 202126
5 202020
6 202020
7 202110
8 201310
9 20188
10 20188
11 20196
12 20175
13 20225
14 20204
15 20214
16 20234
17 20104
18 20233
19 20233
20 20243

About Emma Field

Emma Field is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Health, having authored 36 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (5 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (4 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers), Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (4 papers), Zoonotic diseases and public health (3 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (3 papers) and Public Health Policies and Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (167 citations), Infectious Diseases (302 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (96 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (166 citations) and Health (54 citations). Emma Field has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Mongolia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen B. Lambert, Keith Grimwood, Hassan Vally, Carl D. Kirkwood, Jim Buttery, Jonathan Akikusa, Kristine Macartney, Michael D. Nissen, Matt Brearley and Sarah Carter. Their work appears in journals such as Western Pacific surveillance response journal, Vaccine, International Journal of Health Policy and Management, Rural and Remote Health and Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact