Countries where authors publish in Rural and Remote Health
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Rural and Remote Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Rural and Remote Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rural and Remote Health more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Rural and Remote Health
This network shows the impact of papers published in Rural and Remote Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Rural and Remote Health.
About Rural and Remote Health
The 1.9k papers published in Rural and Remote Health in the last decades have received a total of 29.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Rural and Remote Health usually cover Emergency Medical Services (478 papers), Health (57 papers), Periodontics (31 papers), General Health Professions (173 papers) and Research and Theory (5 papers) specifically the topics of Global Health Workforce Issues (471 papers), Global Health and Surgery (49 papers), Dental Education, Practice, Research (40 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (39 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (35 papers), Dental Health and Care Utilization (30 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (30 papers) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Rural and Remote Health are Ian Couper, Diann Eley, Natalie Bradford, Anthony C Smith, Liam J Caffery, Roger Strasser, Paul Worley, Beverly Leipert, Judi Walker and Steve Reid.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.