Emily E. Scott
Impact in
- Soil Science top 10%
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Computer Science Applications top 10%
- Online Learning and Analytics
Papers in
-
- Science Education and Pedagogy 7
- Innovative Teaching Methods 2
-
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies 3
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 3
- Co-authors
- David E. Rothstein (3 shared papers)Jennifer H. Doherty (8 shared papers)Mary Pat Wenderoth (6 shared papers)Lauren N. Jescovitch (4 shared papers)Kevin C. Haudek (4 shared papers)John Merrill (2 shared papers)Mark Urban‐Lurain (2 shared papers)Jenny McFarland (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- CBE—Life Sciences Education (4 papers)Annals of Botany (1 paper)Oecologia (1 paper)Journal of Research in Science Teaching (1 paper)Practical assessment, research & evaluation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Emily E. Scott
15 papers receiving 347 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Soil Science 71
- Computer Science Applications 41
- Environmental Chemistry 50
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 63
- Health Informatics 6
Countries citing papers authored by Emily E. Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily E. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily E. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily E. Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily E. Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily E. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily E. Scott. The network helps show where Emily E. Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Emily E. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 85 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 81 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 0 |
About Emily E. Scott
Emily E. Scott is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Ecology, Molecular Biology and Social Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science Education and Pedagogy (7 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (2 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (2 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (71 citations), Computer Science Applications (41 citations), Environmental Chemistry (50 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (63 citations) and Health Informatics (6 citations). Emily E. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include David E. Rothstein, Jennifer H. Doherty, Mary Pat Wenderoth, Lauren N. Jescovitch, Kevin C. Haudek, John Merrill, Mark Urban‐Lurain, Jenny McFarland, Vashti Sawtelle and Sonia M. Underwood. Their work appears in journals such as CBE—Life Sciences Education, Annals of Botany, Oecologia, Journal of Research in Science Teaching and Practical assessment, research & evaluation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.