Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England
Impact in
- Health 202
Classified as
- Journal
- Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w15379509 →Countries where authors are citing Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England
This map shows the geographic impact of Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England
This network shows the impact of Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England.
About Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England
This paper, published in 2020, received 341 indexed citations . Written by Felicity Waite, Chiara Causier and Emily Bold covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science and Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (240 citations), Health (202 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (90 citations), Clinical Psychology (75 citations) and Infectious Diseases (68 citations). Published in Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w15379509.