Émilie Lapointe

20 papers receiving 695 citations

Peers

Émilie Lapointe
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 488
  • Social Psychology 246
  • Demography 104
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 21
  • Communication 55
Replace Gökhan Karagonlar with:
Gökhan Karagonlar Türkiye
Chris W. L. Chu United Kingdom
Wen-Long Zhuang Taiwan
Yuanyuan Huo Hong Kong
Christoph Nohe Germany
Su-Fen Chiu Taiwan
Edna Rabenu Israel
Nathanael S. Campbell United States
SinHui Chong United States
Robert J. Riggle United States
Émilie Lapointe relative to Gökhan Karagonlar Türkiye Gökhan Karagonlar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gökhan Karagonlar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Émilie Lapointe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Émilie Lapointe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Émilie Lapointe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Émilie Lapointe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Émilie Lapointe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Émilie Lapointe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Émilie Lapointe. The network helps show where Émilie Lapointe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Émilie Lapointe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Émilie Lapointe Line = papers co-authored together Émilie Lapointe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015149
2 2011102
3 201381
4 201676
5 201865
6 201459
7 201834
8 201930
9 202026
10 201626
11 201124
12 201921
13 20199
14 20208
15 20215
16 20134
17 20153
18 20242
19 20192
20 20201

About Émilie Lapointe

Émilie Lapointe is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Communication, having authored 22 papers that have together received 727 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (17 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (5 papers), Mentoring and Academic Development (4 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (3 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (2 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (488 citations), Social Psychology (246 citations), Demography (104 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (21 citations) and Communication (55 citations). Émilie Lapointe has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, China and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Christian Vandenberghe, Jean‐Sébastien Boudrias, Alexandra Panaccio, Alexandre J. S. Morin, Nicolas Gillet, Evelyne Fouquereau, René Mokounkolo, Steven Shijin Zhou, Abby Jingzi Zhou and Jinyun Duan. Their work appears in journals such as Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, The International Journal of Human Resource Management and Journal of Management & Organization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact