Ellery Eells

41 papers receiving 928 citations

Peers

Ellery Eells
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • History and Philosophy of Science 423
  • General Decision Sciences 167
  • Philosophy 354
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 204
  • Artificial Intelligence 336
Replace Colin Howson with:
Colin Howson United Kingdom
Peter Urbach United Kingdom
Branden Fitelson United States
Ernest W. Adams United States
Alan Hájek Australia
Wolfgang Spohn Germany
Gerhard Schurz Germany
Vincenzo Crupi Italy
Teddy Seidenfeld United States
Katya Tentori Italy
Ellery Eells relative to Colin Howson United Kingdom Colin Howson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Colin Howson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ellery Eells

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellery Eells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellery Eells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellery Eells more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellery Eells

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellery Eells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellery Eells. The network helps show where Ellery Eells may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Ellery Eells, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ellery Eells Line = papers co-authored together Ellery Eells links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991194
2 1990173
3 1983110
4 1988106
5 200290
6 200045
7 199134
8 200033
9 201632
10 198128
11 198427
12 201025
13 198922
14 198617
15 198517
16 198717
17 198416
18
Bayesian problems of old evidence
199013
19 198312
20 198710

About Ellery Eells

Ellery Eells is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence, General Decision Sciences and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (14 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (14 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (8 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (7 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers), Probability and Statistical Research (2 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (423 citations), General Decision Sciences (167 citations), Philosophy (354 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (204 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (336 citations). Ellery Eells has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Resnik, Brian Skyrms, Branden Fitelson, Elliott Sober, Joseph Y. Halpern, Leland Gerson Neuberg, James Cargile, William Harper, Wayne A. Davis and Nancy Cartwright. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, The Philosophical Review, Synthese, Theory and Decision and The Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact