James Cargile

42 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

James Cargile
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • History and Philosophy of Science 174
  • General Decision Sciences 50
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 497
  • Philosophy 223
  • Mechanics of Materials 451
Replace Richard J. Blackwell with:
Richard J. Blackwell United States
Patrick A. Heelan United States
G. P. Baker Australia
Michel Henry France
William P. D. Wightman United Kingdom
Marcus Tullius Cıcero United States
Aidan Lyon United States
Glenn R. Myers Australia
John Murphy United States
Morris Berman United States
James Cargile relative to Richard J. Blackwell United States Richard J. Blackwell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26.5×
Richard J. Blackwell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Cargile

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Cargile's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Cargile with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Cargile more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Cargile

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Cargile. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Cargile. The network helps show where James Cargile may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside James Cargile, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Cargile Line = papers co-authored together James Cargile links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994370
2 1994144
3 2005131
4 1999111
5 198179
6 200075
7 196947
8 199042
9 197034
10 197028
11 199023
12 200822
13 199318
14
Perforation of thin unreinforced concrete slabs
199317
15 196613
16 201013
17 199210
18 198110
19
Development of a Constitutive Model for Numerical Simulation of Projectile Penetration into Brittle Geomaterials
19999
20 19678

About James Cargile

James Cargile is a scholar working on Philosophy, Materials Chemistry, Civil and Structural Engineering, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Structural Response to Dynamic Loads (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (3 papers) and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (174 citations), General Decision Sciences (50 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (497 citations), Philosophy (223 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (451 citations). James Cargile has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include M. J. Forrestal, S.J. Hanchak, Benjamin Altman, Gerald J. Massey, D. J. Frew, Brian Ellis, Edward F. O’Neil, Richmond Campbell, Zdeněk P. Bažant and Milan Jirásek. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, International Journal of Impact Engineering and Noûs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact