Peter Urbach

31 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Peter Urbach
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • History and Philosophy of Science 407
  • General Decision Sciences 76
  • Philosophy 217
  • Statistics and Probability 141
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 164
Replace Donald Gillies with:
Donald Gillies United Kingdom
Colin Howson United Kingdom
Deborah G. Mayo United States
Marc R. Forster United States
Nancy Cartwright United States
Michael Strevens United States
Lorenz Krüger Germany
Peter Achinstein United States
Allan Franklin United States
Jan‐Willem Romeijn Netherlands
Peter Urbach relative to Donald Gillies United Kingdom Donald Gillies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Donald Gillies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Urbach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Urbach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Urbach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Urbach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Urbach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Urbach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Urbach. The network helps show where Peter Urbach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Peter Urbach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Urbach Line = papers co-authored together Peter Urbach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993246
2 1991237
3 1994174
4 197486
5 197482
6 199168
7 198560
8 199844
9
Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science: An Account and a Reappraisal
198735
10 199332
11 199830
12
Novum organum : with other parts of The great instauration
199428
13 198118
14 198116
15 199915
16 198912
17 198312
18 19827
19 19785
20
Clinical trial and random error.
19875

About Peter Urbach

Peter Urbach is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Statistics and Probability, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (3 papers), Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (3 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (3 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (3 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (3 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (407 citations), General Decision Sciences (76 citations), Philosophy (217 citations), Statistics and Probability (141 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (164 citations). Peter Urbach has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Colin Howson, C. Howson, Michael Goldstein, Giovanni Parmigiani, Aa, Wolfgang Kowalsky, Francis Bacon, John Gibson, H.‐H. Johannes and Michael Williams. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Materials Science and Engineering B, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact