Peter Urbach

36 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Peter Urbach
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • History and Philosophy of Science 534
  • General Decision Sciences 87
  • Philosophy 287
  • Statistics and Probability 174
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 187
Replace Colin Howson with:
Colin Howson United Kingdom
Deborah G. Mayo United States
Lorenz Krüger Germany
Allan Franklin United States
Nancy Cartwright United States
Michael Strevens United States
Peter Achinstein United States
William Harper Canada
Rudolph Carnap
James H. Fetzer United States
Peter Urbach relative to Colin Howson United Kingdom Colin Howson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Colin Howson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Urbach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Urbach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Urbach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Urbach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Urbach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Urbach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Urbach. The network helps show where Peter Urbach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Peter Urbach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Urbach Line = papers co-authored together Peter Urbach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991285
2 1993274
3 1994211
4 197497
5 197497
6
Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science: An Account and a Reappraisal
198778
7 199177
8 198572
9 199844
10
Novum organum : with other parts of The great instauration
199437
11 199337
12 199831
13 198123
14 198119
15 197817
16 199916
17 198316
18 198915
19 198210
20 19788

About Peter Urbach

Peter Urbach is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Statistics and Probability, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (3 papers), Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (3 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (3 papers) and Cognitive Science and Mapping (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (534 citations), General Decision Sciences (87 citations), Philosophy (287 citations), Statistics and Probability (174 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (187 citations). Peter Urbach has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Colin Howson, Giovanni Parmigiani, C. Howson, Michael Goldstein, Aa, Wolfgang Kowalsky, Francis Bacon, John Gibson, Michael Williams and Stefan Wiese. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Science, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics and Ratio.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact