Colin Howson

63 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Colin Howson
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • History and Philosophy of Science 663
  • General Decision Sciences 97
  • Philosophy 401
  • Statistics and Probability 138
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 173
Replace Peter Urbach with:
Peter Urbach United Kingdom
Michael Strevens United States
Donald Gillies United Kingdom
Ellery Eells United States
Marc R. Forster United States
Branden Fitelson United States
Nancy Cartwright United States
Peter Achinstein United States
Deborah G. Mayo United States
Paul Humphreys United States
Colin Howson relative to Peter Urbach United Kingdom Peter Urbach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Peter Urbach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colin Howson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin Howson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin Howson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin Howson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin Howson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin Howson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin Howson. The network helps show where Colin Howson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Colin Howson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colin Howson Line = papers co-authored together Colin Howson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991237
2 1994174
3 1995131
4 2000100
5 200098
6 199168
7 198448
8 199140
9 198437
10
Hume's Problem
200027
11 198525
12 199125
13 199723
14 198819
15 200819
16 199419
17 201317
18 199714
19 199613
20 198813

About Colin Howson

Colin Howson is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (35 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (19 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (12 papers), Probability and Statistical Research (9 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (5 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (5 papers) and Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (663 citations), General Decision Sciences (97 citations), Philosophy (401 citations), Statistics and Probability (138 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (173 citations). Colin Howson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter Urbach, Giovanni Parmigiani, Allan Franklin, Aa, Arnold Thackray, Graham Oddie and M. C. Sinha. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Erkenntnis, Philosophy of Science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact