Eli M. Bower

714 citations
42 papers · 485 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Eli M. Bower

35 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers

Eli M. Bower
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Clinical Psychology 276
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 135
  • General Psychology 9
  • Education 164
  • Social Psychology 85
Replace Lovick C. Miller with:
Lovick C. Miller United States
Edward P. Tesiny United States
Helen R. Beiser United States
Lauren Braswell United States
Lee C. Handy Canada
Victoria A. Besalel United States
Ronald K. Bramlett United States
Sherman C. Feinstein United States
Ingo Keilitz United States
Sylvia Voelker Canada
Eli M. Bower relative to Lovick C. Miller United States Lovick C. Miller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lovick C. Miller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eli M. Bower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eli M. Bower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eli M. Bower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eli M. Bower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eli M. Bower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eli M. Bower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eli M. Bower. The network helps show where Eli M. Bower may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Eli M. Bower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eli M. Bower Line = papers co-authored together Eli M. Bower links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198274
2
Behavioral science frontiers in education
196766
3 196158
4 196053
5 196147
6 196328
7 197216
8 196516
9 196613
10 195911
11 196410
12 19679
13 19648
14 19697
15
HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS WHO LATER BECAME SCHIZOPHRENIC.
19607
16 19786
17 19645
18 19685
19 19764
20 19604

About Eli M. Bower

Eli M. Bower is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Speech and Hearing, having authored 42 papers that have together received 485 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational and Psychological Assessments (5 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Child Therapy and Development (2 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers) and Youth Substance Use and School Attendance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (276 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (135 citations), General Psychology (9 citations), Education (164 citations) and Social Psychology (85 citations). Eli M. Bower has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Ivan N. Mensh, Thomas E. Gladwin, Anita K. Bahn and Charles C. Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Exceptional Children, Psychology in the Schools, Review of Educational Research and Journal of School Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact