Edwin P. Marks

1.3k citations
46 papers · 868 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Edwin P. Marks

46 papers receiving 766 citations

Peers

Edwin P. Marks
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Insect Science 448
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 480
  • Genetics 320
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 126
  • Aging 11
Replace Richard R. Mills with:
Richard R. Mills United States
Junko Nishiitsutsuji-Uwo Japan
H. Schooneveld Netherlands
A.B. Koopmanschap Netherlands
B.G. Loughton Canada
Ellen Thomsen United Kingdom
David J. Candy United Kingdom
P. Porcheron France
A. Krishna Kumaran United States
R.M. Wagner United States
Edwin P. Marks relative to Richard R. Mills United States Richard R. Mills's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Richard R. Mills · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin P. Marks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin P. Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin P. Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin P. Marks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin P. Marks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin P. Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin P. Marks. The network helps show where Edwin P. Marks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Edwin P. Marks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin P. Marks Line = papers co-authored together Edwin P. Marks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198160
2 197555
3 197448
4 197546
5 197237
6 197037
7 197235
8 198034
9 197034
10 197127
11 197324
12 196422
13 197122
14 197522
15 197921
16 198321
17 196520
18 196219
19 198718
20 196817

About Edwin P. Marks

Edwin P. Marks is a scholar working on Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science, Molecular Biology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 46 papers that have together received 868 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (30 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (30 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (16 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (12 papers), Insects and Parasite Interactions (8 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (4 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (3 papers) and Plant and animal studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (448 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (480 citations), Genetics (320 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (126 citations) and Aging (11 citations). Edwin P. Marks has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include G.Mark Holman, Roger A. Leopold, J. P. Reinecke, David S. King, Jill Caldwell, Terrance Leighton, Thomas K. Borg, Harold J. Klosterman, Gordon B. Ward and Kenneth J. Judy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Insect Physiology, General and Comparative Endocrinology, Biological Bulletin, Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact