Biological Bulletin

5.5k papers and 158.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.5k papers published in Biological Bulletin in the last decades have received a total of 158.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Biological Bulletin usually cover Ecology (2.1k papers), Oceanography (1.4k papers) and Global and Planetary Change (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Marine Biology and Ecology Research (802 papers), Crustacean biology and ecology (722 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (649 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biological Bulletin are Carroll M. Williams, Rudolf S. Scheltema, L. Muscatine, Alan L. Shanks, Giulio Tononi, Jelle Atema, Thomas F. Goreau, Horace W. Stunkard, J. Timothy Pennington and Howard A. Schneiderman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biological Bulletin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biological Bulletin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biological Bulletin.

Countries where authors publish in Biological Bulletin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biological Bulletin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biological Bulletin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biological Bulletin more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025