David J. Candy
Impact in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Insect Science top 1%
- Insect Utilization and Effects
- Insect and Pesticide Research
Papers in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 17
- Co-authors
- Ruth J. Mayer (3 shared papers)Michael W. Goosey (4 shared papers)Ian M. Spencer (3 shared papers)W. C. L. Ford (1 shared paper)Jeremy Ward (1 shared paper)Stephen N. Smith (1 shared paper)Gerhard Wegener (2 shared papers)Martha C. Anderson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biochemical Society Transactions (6 papers)Journal of Insect Physiology (5 papers)Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (4 papers)Toxicon (2 papers)Physiological Entomology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
David J. Candy
38 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 941
- Insect Science 558
- Genetics 466
- Biochemistry 89
- Ecology 273
Countries citing papers authored by David J. Candy
This map shows the geographic impact of David J. Candy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David J. Candy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David J. Candy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David J. Candy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David J. Candy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David J. Candy. The network helps show where David J. Candy may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside David J. Candy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1969 | 246 | |
| 2 | 1980 | 168 | |
| 3 | 1976 | 105 | |
| 4 | 1978 | 98 | |
| 5 | 1969 | 80 | |
| 6 | 1982 | 66 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 52 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 51 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 50 | |
| 10 | 1967 | 49 | |
| 11 | 1976 | 43 | |
| 12 | 1972 | 42 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 35 | |
| 14 | 1974 | 31 | |
| 15 | 1970 | 31 | |
| 16 | 1979 | 25 | |
| 17 | 1974 | 25 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 22 | |
| 19 | 1980 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 16 |
About David J. Candy
David J. Candy is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Genetics and Insect Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (17 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (10 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (4 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers), Piperaceae Chemical and Biological Studies (3 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (2 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (941 citations), Insect Science (558 citations), Genetics (466 citations), Biochemistry (89 citations) and Ecology (273 citations). David J. Candy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ruth J. Mayer, Michael W. Goosey, Ian M. Spencer, W. C. L. Ford, Jeremy Ward, Stephen N. Smith, Gerhard Wegener, Martha C. Anderson, Christopher J. Kirk and R J Hawker. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Society Transactions, Journal of Insect Physiology, Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Toxicon and Physiological Entomology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.