E. Fuchs

103 papers receiving 6.7k citations

E. Fuchs's Hit Papers

Stress revisited: A critical evaluation of the stress concept 2011 · 1.1k citations
1.1k0+12+24Years since publication2505007501000

Peers

E. Fuchs
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 1.3k
  • Biological Psychiatry 410
  • Urology 613
  • Developmental Neuroscience 404
  • Cell Biology 1.4k
Replace Hideo Uno with:
Hideo Uno United States
Markus M. Nöthen Germany
Mitsuhiro Kawata Japan
Pentti Tuohimaa Finland
Luigi Aloe Italy
Terry Magnuson United States
Heiner Westphal United States
Yu‐Qiang Ding China
Éva Mezey United States
Ӧlle Johansson Sweden
E. Fuchs relative to Hideo Uno United States Hideo Uno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Hideo Uno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Fuchs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Fuchs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Fuchs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Fuchs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Fuchs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Fuchs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Fuchs. The network helps show where E. Fuchs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Fuchs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Fuchs Line = papers co-authored together E. Fuchs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Stress revisited: A critical evaluation of the stress concept
Hit paper breakdown →
20111129
2
Epidermal differentiation: the bare essentials.
Hit paper breakdown →
1990581
3 1999493
4 2009357
5 1989325
6 1995246
7 2001217
8 1995155
9 2002135
10 1990132
11 1998123
12 1998120
13 1994119
14 2009115
15 1985110
16 1993107
17 1999102
18 200698
19 200393
20 199391

About E. Fuchs

E. Fuchs is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Physiology, Social Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 103 papers that have together received 6.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (27 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (19 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (19 papers), Skin and Cellular Biology Research (14 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (10 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (8 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Biological Psychiatry (410 citations), Urology (613 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (404 citations) and Cell Biology (1.4k citations). E. Fuchs has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include G. Flügge, Uri Gat, Jennifer M. McNiff, Edward F. Chan, Peter Meerlo, Angela L. Tyner, Robert Vassar, Marjorie Rosenberg, Boldizsár Czéh and Jaap M. Koolhaas. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Neuroscience, European Neuropsychopharmacology, Physiology & Behavior and European Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact