Dries Debeer

757 citations
32 papers · 463 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Dries Debeer

27 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Dries Debeer
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Management Science and Operations Research 151
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 86
  • Statistics and Probability 55
  • Computer Science Applications 31
  • Applied Psychology 19
Replace Gilles Raîche with:
Gilles Raîche Canada
Dimitrios Rizopoulos Greece
Abe Dirk Hofman Netherlands
Robert Zwitser Netherlands
Kensuke Okada Japan
Klaus D. Kubinger Austria
Martha D. Petoskey United States
Patrícia Martinková Czechia
Rudolf Debelak Switzerland
Ren Liu United States
Dries Debeer relative to Gilles Raîche Canada Gilles Raîche's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Gilles Raîche · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dries Debeer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dries Debeer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dries Debeer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dries Debeer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dries Debeer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dries Debeer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dries Debeer. The network helps show where Dries Debeer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dries Debeer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dries Debeer Line = papers co-authored together Dries Debeer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020109
2 201391
3 201473
4 201741
5 202030
6 202126
7 202124
8 201910
9 20257
10 20216
11 20185
12 20235
13 20215
14 20174
15 20234
16 20194
17 20234
18 20233
19 20212
20 20212

About Dries Debeer

Dries Debeer is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Education, Computer Networks and Communications, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 32 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (8 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (5 papers), Software Engineering Research (3 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (2 papers) and School Choice and Performance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (151 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (86 citations), Statistics and Probability (55 citations), Computer Science Applications (31 citations) and Applied Psychology (19 citations). Dries Debeer has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rianne Janssen, Carolin Strobl, Johannes Hartig, Janine Buchholz, Paul De Boeck, Wim Van Den Noortgate, Stefanie Vanbecelaere, Fien Depaepe, Bert Reynvoet and Marc Brysbaert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Measurement, Applied Psychological Measurement, Journal of Cognition, Assessment and Cognitive Therapy and Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact