Simon Forstmeier

3.7k citations
104 papers · 2.3k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Simon Forstmeier

89 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Simon Forstmeier
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 167
  • Clinical Psychology 657
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 366
  • Health 198
  • Applied Psychology 120
Replace Andrea M. Piccinin with:
Andrea M. Piccinin Canada
Alfons Marcoen Belgium
Alex E. Schwartzman Canada
Juan C. Meléndez Spain
Dolores Gold Canada
Brett Q. Ford United States
Jane Simpson United Kingdom
David John Hallford Australia
Jan Mohlman United States
Nicholas A. Turiano United States
Simon Forstmeier relative to Andrea M. Piccinin Canada Andrea M. Piccinin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Andrea M. Piccinin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Forstmeier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Forstmeier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Forstmeier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Forstmeier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Forstmeier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Forstmeier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Forstmeier. The network helps show where Simon Forstmeier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simon Forstmeier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Forstmeier Line = papers co-authored together Simon Forstmeier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012288
2 2013220
3 2004180
4 2008156
5 200797
6 201083
7 200672
8 200871
9 200969
10 201264
11 200058
12 201356
13 201255
14 201852
15 201240
16 201231
17 201131
18 201429
19 201529
20 200128

About Simon Forstmeier

Simon Forstmeier is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 104 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (20 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (13 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (11 papers), Family Support in Illness (11 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (8 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (8 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (167 citations), Clinical Psychology (657 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (366 citations), Health (198 citations) and Applied Psychology (120 citations). Simon Forstmeier has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Maercker, Martin Pinquart, Aureliu Lavric, Diego A. Pizzagalli, Heide Glaesmer, Birgit Wagner, Steffi G. Riedel‐Heller, Melanie Luppa, Hans‐Helmut König and Michaela Schwarzbach. Their work appears in journals such as Aging & Mental Health, Frontiers in Psychology, BMC Psychiatry, BMC Geriatrics and Alzheimer s & Dementia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact