Dolores Pushkar

38 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Dolores Pushkar
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 260
  • Health 225
  • Applied Psychology 126
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 295
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 214
Replace Andrew E. Reed with:
Andrew E. Reed United States
Leslie D. Frazier United States
Dieter Ferring Luxembourg
Hal Ersner-Hershfield United States
Anne C. Krendl United States
Daniel Grühn United States
Jennifer Lodi‐Smith United States
Diane Holmberg Canada
Ellen Bouchard Ryan Canada
Robert Kastenbaum United States
Dolores Pushkar relative to Andrew E. Reed United States Andrew E. Reed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Andrew E. Reed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dolores Pushkar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dolores Pushkar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dolores Pushkar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dolores Pushkar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dolores Pushkar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dolores Pushkar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dolores Pushkar. The network helps show where Dolores Pushkar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dolores Pushkar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dolores Pushkar Line = papers co-authored together Dolores Pushkar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007225
2 200892
3 200676
4 199870
5 201268
6 199860
7 200556
8 200053
9 200649
10 200948
11 200047
12 199847
13 200947
14 196145
15 200042
16 201237
17 200233
18 199727
19 199725
20 199924

About Dolores Pushkar

Dolores Pushkar is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Social Psychology, Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (14 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (8 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (5 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (5 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (5 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (260 citations), Health (225 citations), Applied Psychology (126 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (295 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (214 citations). Dolores Pushkar has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Conway, Dorothea Bye, Tannis Y. Arbuckle, June Chaikelson, Urs Maag, Myrna Reis, Philippe Goffaux, Natalie A. Phillips, Paul Bourque and François Béland. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Aging, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Sex Roles.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact