Daniel Grühn

3.1k citations
34 papers · 2.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Grühn

34 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Daniel Grühn
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 519
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 546
  • Social Psychology 809
  • Applied Psychology 171
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 511
Replace Phoebe E. Bailey with:
Phoebe E. Bailey Australia
Tammy English United States
Ute Kunzmann Germany
Anne C. Krendl United States
Heather A. Wadlinger United States
Andrew E. Reed United States
Fredda Blanchard–Fields United States
Robert W. Levenson United States
Dorthe Kirkegaard Thomsen Denmark
Dolores Pushkar Canada
Daniel Grühn relative to Phoebe E. Bailey Australia Phoebe E. Bailey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Phoebe E. Bailey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Grühn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Grühn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Grühn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Grühn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Grühn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Grühn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Grühn. The network helps show where Daniel Grühn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Grühn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Grühn Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Grühn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012220
2 2008215
3 2008210
4 2012207
5 2005170
6 2005155
7 201590
8 201290
9 201385
10 201080
11 201577
12 200774
13 201061
14 201250
15 200843
16 201240
17 201830
18 201024
19 201820
20 201620

About Daniel Grühn

Daniel Grühn is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 34 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (14 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (10 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (6 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (5 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (3 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (519 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (546 citations), Social Psychology (809 citations), Applied Psychology (171 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (511 citations). Daniel Grühn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gisela Labouvie‐Vief, Susanne Scheibe, Jacqui Smith, Ute Kunzmann, Mark A. Lumley, Manfred Diehl, Paul B. Baltes, Anne-Laure Gilet, Joseph Studer and Edward J. O’Brien. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Aging, Innovation in Aging, The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Emotion and Behavior Research Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact