Dixie Ching

485 citations
13 papers · 353 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Dixie Ching

13 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

Dixie Ching
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Computer Science Applications 107
  • Neurology 40
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 47
  • Gender Studies 33
  • Cell Biology 50
Replace Carrie Spencer with:
Carrie Spencer United States
Xing Huang China
Charlotte Brack Australia
Shu-Chu Chen Taiwan
Ryan Splittgerber United States
Pearl Chen United States
Jeff Haywood United Kingdom
Lawrence A. Beck United States
Yasushige Ishikawa Japan
Niren Kapoor United States
Dixie Ching relative to Carrie Spencer United States Carrie Spencer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.4×
Carrie Spencer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dixie Ching

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dixie Ching's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dixie Ching with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dixie Ching more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dixie Ching

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dixie Ching. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dixie Ching. The network helps show where Dixie Ching may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Dixie Ching, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dixie Ching Line = papers co-authored together Dixie Ching links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 199789
2 201766
3 199954
4 199951
5
CS for What? Diverse Visions of Computer Science Education in Practice
201928
6 201622
7
The rise of the super experiment
201213
8 20139
9
"Battleship Numberline": A Digital Game for Improving Estimation Accuracy on Fraction Number Lines.
20118
10 20176
11 20163
12
When a console game becomes CSCL: Play' participatory learning and 8-bit home computing in India
20112
13 20122

About Dixie Ching

Dixie Ching is a scholar working on Education, Computer Science Applications, Molecular Biology, Information Systems and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (4 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (3 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers), Barrier Structure and Function Studies (2 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers) and Green IT and Sustainability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (107 citations), Neurology (40 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (47 citations), Gender Studies (33 citations) and Cell Biology (50 citations). Dixie Ching has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Guam and India. Frequent co-authors include Rafi Santo, Sara Vogel, Gary L. Firestone, Vivian W.Y. Wong, Pierre D. McCrea, Nancy E. Lewin, Peter M. Blumberg, Marcelo G. Kazanietz, Paul L. Woo and Marı́a J. Caloca. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Cultural Studies of Science Education, On the Horizon The International Journal of Learning Futures, Computer Supported Collaborative Learning and Educational Data Mining.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact