Dirk van Dalen

31 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Dirk van Dalen
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Theoretical Computer Science 65
  • History and Philosophy of Science 99
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 253
  • Artificial Intelligence 295
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 90
Replace Wilfried Sieg with:
Wilfried Sieg United States
W. W. Tait United States
Harold T. Hodes United States
John N. Crossley Australia
Hans Hermes Germany
Warren Goldfarb United States
Paul Bernays Switzerland
Colin McLarty United States
Dag Prawitz Sweden
Steven Givant United States
Dirk van Dalen relative to Wilfried Sieg United States Wilfried Sieg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Wilfried Sieg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dirk van Dalen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dirk van Dalen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dirk van Dalen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dirk van Dalen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dirk van Dalen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dirk van Dalen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dirk van Dalen. The network helps show where Dirk van Dalen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Dirk van Dalen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dirk van Dalen Line = papers co-authored together Dirk van Dalen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980210
2 200441
3 199433
4 200225
5 199524
6 201321
7 198318
8
Zermelo and the Skolem Paradox
199815
9 200215
10 201312
11 199912
12 198012
13 199710
14 197410
15 19967
16
Mystic, Geometer, and Intuitionist: The Life of L. E. J. Brouwer Volume 1: The Dawning Revolution
19997
17 20036
18 19785
19 20004
20 19744

About Dirk van Dalen

Dirk van Dalen is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Theoretical Computer Science, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (7 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (6 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (5 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (5 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (5 papers), Mathematics and Applications (5 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (65 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (99 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (253 citations), Artificial Intelligence (295 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (90 citations). Dirk van Dalen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Mark van Atten, Richard Tieszen, Heinz-Dieter Ebbinghaus, Warren Goldfarb, Douglas Bridges, Marc Bezem, Hajime Ishihara and David E. Rowe. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, Journal of Symbolic Logic, Studia Logica, Theoretical Computer Science and dialectica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact