David E. Rowe

2.1k citations
140 papers · 1.0k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

David E. Rowe

112 papers receiving 863 citations

Peers

David E. Rowe
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Theoretical Computer Science 548
  • History and Philosophy of Science 378
  • Geometry and Topology 185
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 337
  • General Psychology 10
Replace Leo Corry with:
Leo Corry Israel
Erhard Scholz Germany
Michel Janssen United States
Klaus Hentschel Germany
Tilman Sauer Germany
A.J. Kox Netherlands
Detlef Laugwitz Germany
David B. Malament United States
James Owen Weatherall United States
Russell McCormmach United States
David E. Rowe relative to Leo Corry Israel Leo Corry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Leo Corry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Rowe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Rowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Rowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Rowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Rowe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Rowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Rowe. The network helps show where David E. Rowe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David E. Rowe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David E. Rowe Line = papers co-authored together David E. Rowe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 140 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The collected papers of Albert Einstein
2009206
2 199470
3 198960
4
Natur und mathematisches Erkennen : Vorlesungen, gehalten 1919-1920 in Göttingen
199239
5 199835
6 199934
7 198633
8 200427
9 199326
10 200725
11 198524
12 200124
13 201322
14 201221
15 200019
16 198919
17 201814
18 199414
19 198112
20 200810

About David E. Rowe

David E. Rowe is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geometry and Topology and Philosophy, having authored 140 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (71 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (36 papers), Mathematics and Applications (30 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (28 papers), History and Developments in Astronomy (10 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (6 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (548 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (378 citations), Geometry and Topology (185 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (337 citations) and General Psychology (10 citations). David E. Rowe has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Karen Hunger Parshall, A.J. Kox, Albert Einstein, Diana Kormos Buchwald, Daniel Kennefick, Robert Schulmann, Michel Janssen, Martin J. Klein, John Stachel and David Hilbert. Their work appears in journals such as Historia Mathematica, Isis, The Mathematical Intelligencer, Metascience and Science in Context.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact