Dina Perrone

1.0k citations
19 papers · 759 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Dina Perrone

17 papers receiving 716 citations

Peers

Dina Perrone
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Applied Psychology 98
  • Toxicology 30
  • Sociology and Political Science 357
  • Clinical Psychology 137
  • Health 39
Replace Kathleen M. Lenk with:
Kathleen M. Lenk United States
Nancy Nicosia United States
József Rácz Hungary
Helene Wells Australia
Jennifer Cornacchione Ross United States
Rocío Ortiz-Moncada Spain
Anna V. Song United States
Emeka W. Dumbili Nigeria
L. King Australia
James F. Mosher United States
Dina Perrone relative to Kathleen M. Lenk United States Kathleen M. Lenk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Kathleen M. Lenk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dina Perrone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dina Perrone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina Perrone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina Perrone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dina Perrone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina Perrone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina Perrone. The network helps show where Dina Perrone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Dina Perrone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dina Perrone Line = papers co-authored together Dina Perrone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2004267
2 2001174
3 201072
4 200358
5 201240
6 201427
7 201024
8 202121
9 202120
10 202114
11 202213
12
Original Communication Food consumption patterns in Italy: the INN-CA Study 1994 - 1996
200111
13 202110
14
Banche dati nutrizionali : un'applicazione su uno studio a carattere nazionale
19993
15 20233
16 20031
17
Innovative technologies for offshore platforms safety and environmental monitoring
20171
18 20250
19 20240

About Dina Perrone

Dina Perrone is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 759 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers), Sex work and related issues (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (3 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (3 papers) and Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (98 citations), Toxicology (30 citations), Sociology and Political Science (357 citations), Clinical Psychology (137 citations) and Health (39 citations). Dina Perrone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Travis C. Pratt, Christopher J. Sullivan, Aida Turrini, Anna Saba, Amleto D’Amicis, Aili Malm, Brian Frederick, Michael D. White, Matteo Cocuzza and Luciano Scaltrito. Their work appears in journals such as Substance Use & Misuse, The Prison Journal, Qualitative Research, American Journal of Criminal Justice and Criminal Justice Policy Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact