Countries where authors publish in The Prison Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Prison Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Prison Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Prison Journal more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Prison Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Prison Journal.
About The Prison Journal
The 1.2k papers published in The Prison Journal in the last decades have received a total of 21.3k indexed citations . Papers published in The Prison Journal usually cover Clinical Psychology (480 papers), Sociology and Political Science (837 papers), General Health Professions (311 papers), Gender Studies (48 papers) and Law (46 papers) specifically the topics of Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (775 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (304 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (289 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (262 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (93 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (75 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (36 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (33 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Prison Journal are Joan Petersilia, Eric G. Lambert, Shanhe Jiang, Francis T. Cullen, Richard Tewksbury, Scott D. Camp, Harry K. Wexler, L. Thomas Winfree, Paul Gendreau and D. Dwayne Simpson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.