Criminal Justice Policy Review

928 papers and 10.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 928 papers published in Criminal Justice Policy Review in the last decades have received a total of 10.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Criminal Justice Policy Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (754 papers), Clinical Psychology (315 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (181 papers) specifically the topics of Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (509 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (475 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (223 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Criminal Justice Policy Review are Cassia Spohn, Grant Duwe, Lisa L. Sample, Tammy Rinehart Kochel, Dawn Beichner, Willard M. Oliver, Jill S. Levenson, Stephanie W. Hartwell, Valerie Clark and Eric G. Lambert.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Criminal Justice Policy Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Criminal Justice Policy Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Criminal Justice Policy Review.

Countries where authors publish in Criminal Justice Policy Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Criminal Justice Policy Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Criminal Justice Policy Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Criminal Justice Policy Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025