Dina Berkeley

521 citations
15 papers · 403 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Dina Berkeley

15 papers receiving 346 citations

Peers

Dina Berkeley
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • General Decision Sciences 135
  • Management Science and Operations Research 83
  • Management Information Systems 53
  • Family Practice 9
  • General Health Professions 48
Replace Emre Soyer with:
Emre Soyer Spain
Liat Hadar Israel
Gokul Bhandari Canada
Harvey J. Brightman United States
Andrew Prahl Singapore
Jihoon Jhang United States
Helen M. Kelley Canada
Mallesh M. Pai United States
Lester R. Frankel United States
Dina Berkeley relative to Emre Soyer Spain Emre Soyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.6×
Emre Soyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dina Berkeley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dina Berkeley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina Berkeley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina Berkeley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dina Berkeley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina Berkeley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina Berkeley. The network helps show where Dina Berkeley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Dina Berkeley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dina Berkeley Line = papers co-authored together Dina Berkeley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1982180
2 199140
3 199837
4 200632
5
Handling Uncertainty Levels of Analysis of Decision Problems
198522
6 198317
7 200314
8 200614
9 199311
10 198510
11 19929
12
Organisational psychology and psychologists in organisations: Focus on organisational transformation
19967
13
Demands made on general practice by women before and after an abortion.
19844
14
Representing risks: supporting genetic counseling.
19874
15 20052

About Dina Berkeley

Dina Berkeley is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research, General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Urban Studies, having authored 15 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers), Public Health Policies and Education (2 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (2 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers), Organizational Management and Change (1 paper), Reproductive Health and Contraception (1 paper) and Ethics and bioethics in healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (135 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (83 citations), Management Information Systems (53 citations), Family Practice (9 citations) and General Health Professions (48 citations). Dina Berkeley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Humphreys, Jane Springett, Patrick Brézillon, Vladislav Rajkovič, George R. Widmeyer, Ross Duncan, Robert de Hoog and Sandra Jovchelovitch. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Acta Psychologica, Culture Health & Sexuality and Construction Management and Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact