Liat Hadar

18 papers receiving 730 citations

Peers

Liat Hadar
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • General Decision Sciences 361
  • Applied Psychology 115
  • Marketing 125
  • Accounting 136
  • Safety Research 80
Replace Michael J. Liersch with:
Michael J. Liersch United States
Marc Scholten Portugal
Deborah Frisch United States
Sema Barlas United States
James Sundali United States
Thomas Epper Switzerland
Gülden Ülkümen United States
Ned Augenblick United States
Uriel Haran Israel
Philipp Otto Germany
Liat Hadar relative to Michael J. Liersch United States Michael J. Liersch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Michael J. Liersch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liat Hadar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liat Hadar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liat Hadar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liat Hadar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liat Hadar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liat Hadar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liat Hadar. The network helps show where Liat Hadar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Liat Hadar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liat Hadar Line = papers co-authored together Liat Hadar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2013231
2 2006130
3 2006126
4 200978
5 201449
6 201442
7 200833
8 200827
9 201923
10 201819
11
Subjective Knowledge in Consumer Financial Decisions
201311
12 20217
13 20084
14
Information asymmetry in decision from description versus decision from experience
20093
15 20202
16
Giving Advice Under Uncertainty: What You Do, What You Should Do, and What Others Think You Do
20082
17
When Knowledge is Demotivating: Subjective Knowledge and Choice Overload
20141
18
Psychological Construal of Economic Behavior
20081
19
Can Annuity Purchase Intentions Be Influenced
20111

About Liat Hadar

Liat Hadar is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Applied Psychology, Economics and Econometrics and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 790 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (2 papers) and Forecasting Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (361 citations), Applied Psychology (115 citations), Marketing (125 citations), Accounting (136 citations) and Safety Research (80 citations). Liat Hadar has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Craig R. Fox, Sanjay Sood, Ilan Fischer, Vicki G. Morwitz, David Leiser, Ofer H. Azar, Aner Sela, Siân Morgan, Ralph Hertwig and Boaz M. Ben‐David. Their work appears in journals such as Judgment and Decision Making, Psychological Science, Journal of Economic Psychology, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making and Journal of Marketing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact