Dina Abbott

495 citations
22 papers · 334 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Dina Abbott

21 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers

Dina Abbott
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Urban Studies 54
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 16
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 78
  • Geography, Planning and Development 32
  • Education 104
Replace Thomas Macintyre with:
Thomas Macintyre Netherlands
Angelique Chettiparamb United Kingdom
Trent Brown Australia
Ali Roziqin Indonesia
Dimity Podger United Kingdom
Carlos Alberto Cioce Sampaio Brazil
Wendy Sarkissian Australia
May East United Kingdom
Sanja Kovačić Serbia
Patricia Machemer United States
Dina Abbott relative to Thomas Macintyre Netherlands Thomas Macintyre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.8×
Thomas Macintyre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dina Abbott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dina Abbott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina Abbott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina Abbott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dina Abbott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina Abbott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina Abbott. The network helps show where Dina Abbott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Dina Abbott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dina Abbott Line = papers co-authored together Dina Abbott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201769
2 199853
3 200645
4 201032
5 201526
6 201425
7 201516
8 201116
9 200613
10 20129
11 20046
12 20195
13
Anxiety and Paradox: teachers' initial responses to change under the National Curriculum
19924
14 20153
15 19973
16 20152
17 20152
18 20122
19 19961
20 20151

About Dina Abbott

Dina Abbott is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management, Global and Planetary Change, Urban Studies and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 22 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate Change Communication and Perception (6 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (5 papers), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (3 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (1 paper), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (1 paper) and Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (54 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (16 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (78 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (32 citations) and Education (104 citations). Dina Abbott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Gordon Anthony Wilson, Francisca Pérez Salgado, Michael Barke, Greg O’Hare, Patrick Willems, Jonathan B. Imber, Miltiadis Demetrios Lytras, Alan Roulstone, Joop de Kraker and Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of International Development, Sustainability Science, Cities, International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning and Capital & Class.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact