Diana Dryer Wright

409 citations
16 papers · 342 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Diana Dryer Wright

16 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

Diana Dryer Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • General Health Professions 204
  • Family Practice 12
  • Pharmacy 20
  • Emergency Medical Services 19
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 37
Replace Jo Ivey Boufford with:
Jo Ivey Boufford United States
F. M. Hull United Kingdom
Liisa Neittaanmäki Finland
Arthur Hibble United Kingdom
Natasha Elmore United Kingdom
Florence Kavaler United States
Tara Sampalli Canada
Shehnaz Alidina United States
Jean Karl Soler Netherlands
Nancy Risser United States
Diana Dryer Wright relative to Jo Ivey Boufford United States Jo Ivey Boufford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Jo Ivey Boufford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Dryer Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Dryer Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Dryer Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Dryer Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Dryer Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Dryer Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Dryer Wright. The network helps show where Diana Dryer Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Diana Dryer Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diana Dryer Wright Line = papers co-authored together Diana Dryer Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1978192
2 198120
3 197719
4 197718
5 197715
6 197814
7
Differences in the outcomes of acute episodes of care provided by various types of family practitioners.
197813
8 197812
9
A method for assessing the outcome of acute primary care.
197711
10 19769
11 19788
12 20007
13 19821
14 19781
15 19801
16 19821

About Diana Dryer Wright

Diana Dryer Wright is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Emergency Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (2 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers) and Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (204 citations), Family Practice (12 citations), Pharmacy (20 citations), Emergency Medical Services (19 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (37 citations). Diana Dryer Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert L Kane, F. Ross Woolley, Charles C. Hughes, Donna M. Olsen, David N. Sundwall, Thomas J. Smith, Robert Kane, Jerry D. Gardner, C. Hilmon Castle and William N. Rom. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Care, Journal of Community Health, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, JAMA and Occupational Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact