Occupational Medicine

3.9k papers and 75.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.9k papers published in Occupational Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 75.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Occupational Medicine usually cover General Health Professions (948 papers), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (663 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (625 papers) specifically the topics of Workplace Health and Well-being (669 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (654 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (398 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Occupational Medicine are Eugene Waclawski, Nerys Williams, Anders Knutsson, Torbjörn Åkerstedt, David Snashall, K. T. Palmer, G. David, David Koh, Simon Folkard and Alexandre Chan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Occupational Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Occupational Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Occupational Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Occupational Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Occupational Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Occupational Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Occupational Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025