David Pick

83 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

David Pick
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 367
  • Public Administration 61
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 296
  • Social Psychology 312
  • Demography 135
Replace David P. Costanza with:
David P. Costanza United States
Janice Langan‐Fox Australia
Debra J. Cohen United States
Xin Wei United States
Regina Conti United States
Danni Wang United States
Kristen Lucas United States
John R. Aiello United States
Dawn Bennett Australia
John Cromby United Kingdom
David Pick relative to David P. Costanza United States David P. Costanza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
David P. Costanza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Pick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Pick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Pick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Pick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Pick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Pick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Pick. The network helps show where David Pick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Pick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Pick Line = papers co-authored together David Pick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016172
2 2018141
3 200458
4 201348
5 200544
6 201544
7 200039
8 201838
9 201038
10 199435
11 200634
12 202134
13 201132
14 201130
15 201628
16 200327
17 200426
18 201726
19 200825
20 201624

About David Pick

David Pick is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (12 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (8 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (7 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (6 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers) and Higher Education and Employability (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (367 citations), Public Administration (61 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (296 citations), Social Psychology (312 citations) and Demography (135 citations). David Pick has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Teo, Robert W. Proctor, Steven L. Grover, Maree Roche, Cameron Newton, Kim‐Phuong L. Vu, Theodora Issa, Htwe Htwe Thein, Diep Nguyen and Matthew Xerri. Their work appears in journals such as Higher Education Quarterly, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Australian Journal of Public Administration and VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact