David Mead

30 papers receiving 145 citations

Peers

David Mead
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Algebra and Number Theory 61
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 26
  • Geometry and Topology 64
  • Theoretical Computer Science 6
  • Mathematical Physics 33
Replace Jonathan Jordan with:
Jonathan Jordan United Kingdom
I. Tweddle United Kingdom
Daniel E. Loeb France
Edmund Landau Germany
Ju. Linnik Russia
James P. Jones Canada
Lorenz Halbeısen Switzerland
R. E. Hodel United States
Wacław Sierpiński
A. Baker
David Mead relative to Jonathan Jordan United Kingdom Jonathan Jordan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jonathan Jordan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Mead

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Mead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Mead

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Mead. The network helps show where David Mead may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside David Mead, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Mead Line = papers co-authored together David Mead links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199250
2 197241
3 197035
4
Find Your Why: A Practical Guide for Discovering Purpose for You and Your Team
201714
5 197912
6 196811
7 19667
8 19635
9 19665
10 19515
11
Outcomes Aren't All: Defending Process-Based Review of Public Authority Decisions under the Human Rights Act
20124
12 19933
13 20123
14 19912
15 19872
16 19532
17 19742
18 19982
19
The Right to Peaceful Protest under the European Convention on Human Rights - A Content Study of Strasbourg Case Law
20072
20
Of Kettles, Cordons and Crowd Control — Austin v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and the Meaning of 'Deprivation of Liberty'
20091

About David Mead

David Mead is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 221 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (3 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), American Sports and Literature (2 papers), Legal principles and applications (2 papers), Limits and Structures in Graph Theory (2 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (2 papers), Ombudsman and Human Rights (2 papers) and Rings, Modules, and Algebras (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (61 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (26 citations), Geometry and Topology (64 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (6 citations) and Mathematical Physics (33 citations). David Mead has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Simon Sinek, N. J. Demerath, Sherman K. Stein, Władysław Narkiewicz, Jeff King, Michael Rubinstein and Roger C. Alperin. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, American Journal of Mathematics, The Journal of Popular Culture and Extrapolation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact