This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Extrapolation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Extrapolation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Extrapolation more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Extrapolation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Extrapolation.
About Extrapolation
The 677 papers published in Extrapolation in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Extrapolation usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (221 papers), Philosophy (170 papers), Cultural Studies (110 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (44 papers) and History (45 papers) specifically the topics of Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (141 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (87 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (72 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (54 papers), Digital Games and Media (48 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (37 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (35 papers) and Comics and Graphic Narratives (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Extrapolation are Brian Wilson Aldiss, Gerry Canavan, Grace L. Dillon, Lyman Tower Sargent, Darko Suvin, Karen Hellekson, André Brock, Mark McCarthy, Sherryl Vint and Andrew Milner.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.