Daniel E. Loeb

495 citations
25 papers · 268 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel E. Loeb

22 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Loeb
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 94
  • Algebra and Number Theory 89
  • Geometry and Topology 64
  • Applied Mathematics 65
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 75
Replace Paul Lescot with:
Paul Lescot France
А. Г. Постников United States
B. Crstici Romania
Mary Schaps Israel
Wolfgang Gawronski Germany
Robert H. Oehmke United States
Emmanuel Lesigne France
Dudley Stark United Kingdom
Ju. Linnik Russia
Chi-Kwong Li United States
Daniel E. Loeb relative to Paul Lescot France Paul Lescot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Paul Lescot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Loeb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Loeb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Loeb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Loeb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Loeb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Loeb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Loeb. The network helps show where Daniel E. Loeb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Loeb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Loeb Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Loeb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A selected survey of umbral calculus
199545
2 198932
3 199927
4 199227
5 199217
6 199615
7
Richman games
199514
8 199210
9 19909
10 19919
11 19989
12 20007
13 19967
14 19916
15 19945
16 19915
17 19985
18 19965
19 19944
20 19984

About Daniel E. Loeb

Daniel E. Loeb is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 25 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (10 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (8 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (7 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (6 papers), Mathematics and Applications (5 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (4 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (4 papers) and Game Theory and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (94 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (89 citations), Geometry and Topology (64 citations), Applied Mathematics (65 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (75 citations). Daniel E. Loeb has collaborated with scholars based in France, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include A. Di Bucchianico, Gian‐Carlo Rota, Daniel H. Ullman, James Propp, Walter Stromquist, Andrew Conway, Ernesto Damiani and G.-C Rota. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A, Advances in Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications and Studies in Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact