Daniel E. Loeb

488 citations
22 papers · 217 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel E. Loeb

20 papers receiving 186 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Loeb
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 86
  • Algebra and Number Theory 78
  • Geometry and Topology 53
  • Applied Mathematics 43
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 44
Replace А. Г. Постников with:
А. Г. Постников United States
Wolfgang Gawronski Germany
Paul Lescot France
Dudley Stark United Kingdom
Mary Schaps Israel
B. Crstici Romania
Julius Borcea Sweden
Michèle Soria France
David P. Roselle United States
Ju. Linnik Russia
Daniel E. Loeb relative to А. Г. Постников United States А. Г. Постников's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
А. Г. Постников · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Loeb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Loeb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Loeb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Loeb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Loeb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Loeb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Loeb. The network helps show where Daniel E. Loeb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Loeb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Loeb Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Loeb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A selected survey of umbral calculus
199541
2 198928
3 199222
4 199918
5 199215
6 199615
7
Richman games
199510
8 19929
9 19908
10 20007
11 19967
12 19917
13 19915
14 19944
15 19914
16 19984
17 19944
18 19963
19 19963
20 19982

About Daniel E. Loeb

Daniel E. Loeb is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 217 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (10 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (7 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (7 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (4 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (4 papers), Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (3 papers), Mathematics and Applications (3 papers) and Game Theory and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (86 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (78 citations), Geometry and Topology (53 citations), Applied Mathematics (43 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (44 citations). Daniel E. Loeb has collaborated with scholars based in France, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include A. Di Bucchianico, Gian‐Carlo Rota, Daniel H. Ullman, James Propp, Andrew Conway, Walter Stromquist and Ernesto Damiani. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A, Advances in Mathematics, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Discrete Mathematics and Studies in Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact