David Constantine

23 papers receiving 107 citations

Peers

David Constantine
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Space and Planetary Science 7
  • Literature and Literary Theory 43
  • Classics 13
  • Philosophy 35
  • Anthropology 25
Replace William Noël with:
William Noël United States
Gedaliahu G. Stroumsa Israel
Nicholas Roe United Kingdom
Pat Rogers United States
Lia Formigari Italy
Leopold von Ranke
Claus Melchior
Leo Tak-hung Chan Hong Kong
Michael Hattaway United Kingdom
Ruth Ahnert United Kingdom
David Constantine relative to William Noël United States William Noël's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
William Noël · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Constantine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Constantine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Constantine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Constantine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Constantine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Constantine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Constantine. The network helps show where David Constantine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Constantine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Constantine Line = papers co-authored together David Constantine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198560
2 200224
3 202117
4 198813
5 202011
6 200410
7 20027
8
Fields of fire : a life of Sir William Hamilton
20016
9 20205
10 19783
11 20162
12 20182
13
Quantitative Shrinking Target Properties for rotations, interval exchanges and billiards in rational polygons
20122
14 19792
15 19942
16 19882
17 19962
18 20111
19 20161
20 19871

About David Constantine

David Constantine is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Geometry and Topology and Applied Mathematics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 182 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Historical Thought (6 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (6 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (5 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (4 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (3 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (3 papers), Franz Kafka Literary Studies (2 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (7 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (43 citations), Classics (13 citations), Philosophy (35 citations) and Anthropology (25 citations). David Constantine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Richard Jenkyns, Jean‐François Lafont, Daniel J. Thompson, Rosemary Joan Gowran, Mary Goldberg, Nathan Bray, Paula W. Rushton, Jonathan Pearlman, Bill Dodd and Anne Fuchs. Their work appears in journals such as Oxford German Studies, The Modern Language Review, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, International Mathematics Research Notices and The Classical World.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact