Nathan Bray

33 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

Nathan Bray
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Occupational Therapy 106
  • Ophthalmology 78
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 126
  • Health 38
  • Rehabilitation 30
Replace Gwyn C. Jones with:
Gwyn C. Jones United States
Ellen B. M. Elsman Netherlands
Lisa Engel Canada
Richard Moed United States
M Cruddas United Kingdom
Helen Court United Kingdom
SJ Cano United Kingdom
Lex Frieden United States
Grethe Eilertsen Norway
James MacDonald United States
Nathan Bray relative to Gwyn C. Jones United States Gwyn C. Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Gwyn C. Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Bray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Bray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Bray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Bray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Bray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Bray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Bray. The network helps show where Nathan Bray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Bray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Bray Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Bray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201452
2 201545
3 201736
4 201635
5 202034
6 201933
7 201626
8 201723
9 201722
10 202222
11 201921
12 202117
13 201914
14 201713
15 201411
16 20189
17 20209
18 20169
19 20238
20 20207

About Nathan Bray

Nathan Bray is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Occupational Therapy, Clinical Psychology, Economics and Econometrics and Epidemiology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (16 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (12 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (11 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (106 citations), Ophthalmology (78 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (126 citations), Health (38 citations) and Rehabilitation (30 citations). Nathan Bray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Jane Noyes, N. Harris, Barbara Ryan, Miles Stanford, Daniel J. Smıth, Catey Bunce, Claire Nollett, Tom H. Margrain and Robin J. Casten. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Disability and Rehabilitation, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Health Technology Assessment and African Journal of Disability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact