Oxford German Studies

267 papers and 171 indexed citations i.

About

The 267 papers published in Oxford German Studies in the last decades have received a total of 171 indexed citations. Papers published in Oxford German Studies usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (87 papers), Classics (44 papers) and History (44 papers) specifically the topics of German Literature and Culture Studies (49 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (40 papers) and Literature and Cultural Memory (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Oxford German Studies are Stuart Taberner, Galin Tihanov, H. B. Nisbet, William Sayers, Elizabeth Boa, Dorrit Cohn, Mark Hewitson, Ritchie Robertson, Paul Bishop and Peter Thompson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Oxford German Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Oxford German Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Oxford German Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Oxford German Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Oxford German Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Oxford German Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oxford German Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025