David Colaço
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
Papers in
-
- Neural dynamics and brain function 4
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 3
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 3
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 3
- Memory Processes and Influences 2
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 6
- Co-authors
- Édouard Machery (4 shared papers)Stephen Stich (2 shared papers)Wesley Buckwalter (2 shared papers)Michael T. Stuart (1 shared paper)Markus Kneer (1 shared paper)Joshua M. Alexander (1 shared paper)Sarah Robins (1 shared paper)John Bickle (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophy of Science (2 papers)Biology & Philosophy (2 papers)Synthese (1 paper)Episteme (1 paper)Behavioral and Brain Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
David Colaço
14 papers receiving 208 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Philosophy 123
- History and Philosophy of Science 51
- Cognitive Neuroscience 129
- General Decision Sciences 7
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 47
Countries citing papers authored by David Colaço
This map shows the geographic impact of David Colaço's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Colaço with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Colaço more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Colaço
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Colaço. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Colaço. The network helps show where David Colaço may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside David Colaço, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 88 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 13 | An Investigation of Scientific Phenomena | 2019 | 2 |
| 14 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 0 |
About David Colaço
David Colaço is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 17 papers that have together received 235 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (123 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (51 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (129 citations), General Decision Sciences (7 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (47 citations). David Colaço has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Édouard Machery, Stephen Stich, Wesley Buckwalter, Michael T. Stuart, Markus Kneer, Joshua M. Alexander, Sarah Robins, John Bickle and Philipp Haueis. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Biology & Philosophy, Synthese, Episteme and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.