Janet Levin

822 citations
30 papers · 232 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Janet Levin

28 papers receiving 199 citations

Peers

Janet Levin
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • History and Philosophy of Science 64
  • Philosophy 124
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 125
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 113
  • General Decision Sciences 3
Replace Bjørn Torgrim Ramberg with:
Bjørn Torgrim Ramberg Norway
Craig French United Kingdom
Rocco J. Gennaro United States
Nat Hansen United Kingdom
Martine Nida‐Rümelin Switzerland
Pete Mandik United States
Mark Eli Kalderon United Kingdom
Susanna Siegel United States
Andrew Brook Canada
William Fish New Zealand
Janet Levin relative to Bjørn Torgrim Ramberg Norway Bjørn Torgrim Ramberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Bjørn Torgrim Ramberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Levin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Levin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Levin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Levin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Levin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Levin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Levin. The network helps show where Janet Levin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Janet Levin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Levin Line = papers co-authored together Janet Levin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200840
2 200017
3 200516
4 198615
5 198714
6 199013
7 198813
8 202212
9 200212
10 200812
11 200911
12 200710
13 19858
14 20117
15 20075
16 19915
17 20184
18 20193
19 20012
20 19972

About Janet Levin

Janet Levin is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (64 citations), Philosophy (124 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (125 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (113 citations) and General Decision Sciences (3 citations). Janet Levin has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John Heil and P. M. S. Hacker. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, The Philosophical Review, Analysis and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact