Michael T. Stuart

33 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

Michael T. Stuart
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • History and Philosophy of Science 142
  • Philosophy 93
  • General Psychology 9
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 66
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 86
Replace Carol Rovane with:
Carol Rovane United States
Simon J. Evnine United States
Adrian Haddock United Kingdom
Keith Gunderson United States
George Botterill United Kingdom
Max Deutsch Hong Kong
Jennifer Nado Hong Kong
Rowland Stout Ireland
Thomas Grundmann Germany
Guido Löhr Netherlands
Michael T. Stuart relative to Carol Rovane United States Carol Rovane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Carol Rovane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael T. Stuart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael T. Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael T. Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael T. Stuart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael T. Stuart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael T. Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael T. Stuart. The network helps show where Michael T. Stuart may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Michael T. Stuart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael T. Stuart Line = papers co-authored together Michael T. Stuart links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202129
2 201628
3 201927
4 202024
5 201719
6 201917
7 201616
8 201715
9 201913
10 202011
11 201711
12 201310
13 20238
14 20138
15 20188
16 20227
17 20207
18 20227
19 20226
20 20195

About Michael T. Stuart

Michael T. Stuart is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 38 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (21 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers) and Science and Climate Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (142 citations), Philosophy (93 citations), General Psychology (9 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (66 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (86 citations). Michael T. Stuart has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Markus Kneer, Nancy J. Nersessian, David Colaço, Daniel A. Wilkenfeld, Édouard Machery, James R. Brown, James Robert Brown, Luigi Tesio, Kourken Michaelian and Christopher Jude McCarroll. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Philosophy of Science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, European Journal for Philosophy of Science and Perspectives on Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact