John Bickle

51 papers receiving 697 citations

Peers

John Bickle
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • History and Philosophy of Science 409
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 381
  • General Psychology 22
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 158
  • General Decision Sciences 16
Replace Mazviita Chirimuuta with:
Mazviita Chirimuuta United States
Sara Farmhouse Bizarro Portugal
William Ramsey United States
Huib Looren de Jong Netherlands
Charles Wallis United States
Cory Wright United States
Jacqueline Anne Sullivan Canada
Daniel Stoljar Australia
Samuel Guttenplan United Kingdom
Jean-Michel Roy France
John Bickle relative to Mazviita Chirimuuta United States Mazviita Chirimuuta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Mazviita Chirimuuta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Bickle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Bickle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Bickle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Bickle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Bickle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Bickle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Bickle. The network helps show where John Bickle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Bickle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Bickle Line = papers co-authored together John Bickle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003214
2 1998155
3 2006101
4 199242
5 201531
6 201626
7 201321
8 201019
9 200818
10
Engineering the Next Revolution in Neuroscience: The New Science of Experiment Planning
201317
11 200816
12 201311
13 199510
14 199610
15 201910
16 19929
17 20019
18 20079
19 20189
20 19938

About John Bickle

John Bickle is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management and Neurology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 848 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (30 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (27 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research (3 papers), Nanotechnology research and applications (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers) and Cognitive Science and Education Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (409 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (381 citations), General Psychology (22 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (158 citations) and General Decision Sciences (16 citations). John Bickle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Alcino J. Silva, Antonella Tramacere, Ann‐Sophie Barwich, Carl F. Craver, Mark J. Schulz, Andrew J. Steckl, Ian Papautsky, Maxi Schulz, Thang B. Hoang and Frank M. Gerner. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Psychology, Synthese, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Consciousness and Cognition and Topics in Cognitive Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact