David Banham

671 citations
26 papers · 494 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

David Banham

24 papers receiving 477 citations

Peers

David Banham
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Physiology 151
  • Speech and Hearing 30
  • Health 27
  • Emergency Medical Services 19
  • General Health Professions 56
Replace Hani Salim with:
Hani Salim Malaysia
Huda Gharaibeh Jordan
Mary Lawrence Cawthon United States
Lena Lendahls Sweden
Hooman Sharifi Iran
Urmi Bhaumik United States
Regina M van der Meer Netherlands
Linda Van Til Canada
Łucja Bundy United States
Pertti Kekki Finland
David Banham relative to Hani Salim Malaysia Hani Salim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26×
Hani Salim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Banham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Banham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Banham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Banham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Banham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Banham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Banham. The network helps show where David Banham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Banham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Banham Line = papers co-authored together David Banham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000108
2 200267
3 200361
4 201829
5 201721
6 201920
7 201016
8 201716
9 201416
10 201615
11 201913
12 201413
13 201312
14 201112
15 201911
16 201810
17 201110
18 20179
19 20139
20 20118

About David Banham

David Banham is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions, Physiology, Economics and Econometrics and Health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 494 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (1 paper) and Global Health Workforce Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (151 citations), Speech and Hearing (30 citations), Health (27 citations), Emergency Medical Services (19 citations) and General Health Professions (56 citations). David Banham has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Melanie Wakefield, N R Badcock, James Martin, Richard E. Ruffin, Kieran McCaul, Jonathan Karnon, Alex Brown, John Lynch, David Roder and Julie Marker. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, BMC Health Services Research, BMC Public Health, Cancer Epidemiology and Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact