Frida Cheok

19 papers receiving 527 citations

Peers

Frida Cheok
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 146
  • Clinical Psychology 136
  • Social Psychology 122
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Health 32
Replace Piroska Balog with:
Piroska Balog Hungary
Jessica Williams United States
M. Philip Luber United States
Catharina Welin Sweden
H. G. Koenig United States
Ahmed Mohammad Al‐Smadi Jordan
Gemma Randall United Kingdom
Mohsen Taghadosi Iran
Lydia Grypma United States
Cecily Luncheon United States
Frida Cheok relative to Piroska Balog Hungary Piroska Balog's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Piroska Balog · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frida Cheok

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frida Cheok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frida Cheok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frida Cheok more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frida Cheok

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frida Cheok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frida Cheok. The network helps show where Frida Cheok may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frida Cheok, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frida Cheok Line = papers co-authored together Frida Cheok links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200080
2 200177
3 200275
4 200361
5 200352
6 200446
7 200032
8 200631
9 200521
10 200517
11 200316
12 200412
13
Depression after cardiac hospitalisation--the Identifying Depression as a Comorbid Condition (IDACC) study.
200511
14 200011
15 199110
16 20199
17 20065
18 20111
19
Depression after cardiac hospitalisation
20051

About Frida Cheok

Frida Cheok is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 568 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Health and Mental Health (7 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Global Health Workforce Issues (1 paper) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (146 citations), Clinical Psychology (136 citations), Social Psychology (122 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation) and Health (32 citations). Frida Cheok has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert D. Goldney, Laura J. Fisher, David Wilson, Julie Marker, G. Schrader, Graeme Hawthorne, David Banham, Victoria Wade, Peter Frith and Brian J. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, The Medical Journal of Australia, Chronic Respiratory Disease, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health and American Heart Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact