David A. Chaplin
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
-
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Papers in
-
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 4
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 3
-
- Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization 5
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 3
- Co-authors
- Kevin Burgess (3 shared papers)Georg Jaeschke (2 shared papers)Keiji Matsuda (2 shared papers)Matthias Breuning (2 shared papers)Gerhard Bringmann (2 shared papers)Dieter Seebàch (2 shared papers)Alan D. Elbein (2 shared papers)Raymond McCague (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Tetrahedron Letters (4 papers)Organic Process Research & Development (3 papers)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (2 papers)Catalysis Letters (1 paper)Tetrahedron (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCzechiaIndia
In The Last Decade
David A. Chaplin
16 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Organic Chemistry 295
- Inorganic Chemistry 67
- Pharmacology 37
- Pharmacology 49
- Molecular Biology 189
Countries citing papers authored by David A. Chaplin
This map shows the geographic impact of David A. Chaplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David A. Chaplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David A. Chaplin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David A. Chaplin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David A. Chaplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David A. Chaplin. The network helps show where David A. Chaplin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David A. Chaplin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 87 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 35 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 34 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 27 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 20 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 19 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 10 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 1 |
About David A. Chaplin
David A. Chaplin is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Pharmacology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (4 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (3 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (3 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers) and Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (295 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (67 citations), Pharmacology (37 citations), Pharmacology (49 citations) and Molecular Biology (189 citations). David A. Chaplin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Czechia and India. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Burgess, Georg Jaeschke, Keiji Matsuda, Matthias Breuning, Gerhard Bringmann, Dieter Seebàch, Alan D. Elbein, Raymond McCague, Stephen J. Taylor and Mark E. B. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Organic Process Research & Development, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Catalysis Letters and Tetrahedron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.